Simulation, modelling and optimisation for engineering theses, with defensible assumptions.
The simulation converged. Now explain why the mesh, the boundary conditions and the turbulence model were the right choices.
Nobody asks whether the software ran. They ask why this element type, why this convergence criterion, why these assumptions hold for your case, and what happens at the boundary you did not test.
We build the model and the reasoning together, and hand over the editable model files so you can rerun and extend them.
Our work is academic research support. Design certification, structural safety approval and any real-world engineering decision remain the responsibility of the researcher and their institution.
We will say this on every engineering project, and it will appear on any report we produce.
| What you receive |
|---|
| Editable model and mesh files |
| Convergence and grid-independence study |
| Result plots and contour figures at publication quality |
| Written justification of every assumption |
| Validation case where one is available |
Yes. The geometry, the mesh settings, the solver setup and the post-processing files, plus a written record of every assumption.
Yes, and we recommend it. A validation case against published experimental or numerical results is one of the strongest things you can put in a simulation chapter.
Send your topic, your dataset or one draft chapter. We will tell you honestly what it needs — before you pay anything. The first consultation is free.