Shodhyantri Engineering Services
Research · Analysis · Editing · Publication Support
Help to judge MDPI journals and Special Issues, submit through SuSy, plan for the article processing charge and respond well inside short revision windows.
Tell us about your mdpi publication support need. We reply within one working day.
MDPI publication support is for scholars considering one of MDPI's many open access journals, often after receiving a Special Issue invitation by email. MDPI is a Switzerland-based publisher whose journals are fully open access and charge an article processing charge after acceptance. Reviews and decisions often move quickly, which suits tight thesis timelines but leaves little room for slow, unplanned revisions.
Shodhyantri helps you decide whether an MDPI journal suits your work and your institution's expectations, check the Special Issue, prepare a clean SuSy submission and respond to reviewers within short deadlines. Your research and writing remain your own. We guide, check and help draft responses that you approve. Acceptance is decided by academic editors through peer review, and fast review does not change that.
MDPI publishes several hundred open access journals across science, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. All articles are published under Creative Commons licences on mdpi.com. Submissions go through SuSy, MDPI's own online submission system. A large share of papers are submitted to Special Issues, each led by guest editors on a defined theme, alongside regular issues and Topics that span several journals.
Decisions are made by academic editors after peer review, with MDPI editorial staff coordinating the process. Revision windows are typically short. Authors pay the article processing charge only after acceptance, and discounts may come through institutional agreements or reviewer vouchers. Indexing status varies between journals and should be checked individually.
We check each MDPI journal's scope, indexing and recent articles, so your choice rests on evidence rather than an invitation email.
Guest editors, theme, deadline and the Special Issue page on mdpi.com are checked before you submit to that issue.
The article processing charge is discussed early, with institutional agreements and possible discounts checked, so acceptance does not bring surprises.
We plan revision time before submission, so short MDPI deadlines can be met without rushed or incomplete changes.
Even in fast rounds, every comment receives a clear answer and a precise location in the revised manuscript.
Some universities and committees have views on particular open access publishers. We help you confirm local requirements first.
Ten stages, each with a clear output. Nothing moves to the next stage until you have reviewed the last one.
— You review every stage first, then decide —
Scope, indexing, editorial board and recent output of the specific MDPI journal are verified.
The Special Issue page, guest editors' profiles and deadline are confirmed on mdpi.com.
The article processing charge is planned and any institutional agreement or discount is confirmed.
Author contributions, funding, data availability and conflict statements follow MDPI's required format.
Fast responses still address each reviewer point with evidence and visible tracked changes.
Author names, affiliations, figures and references are correct before the article is published online.
Every stage is shared with notes explaining what was changed and why. You and your supervisor check it, and the next stage starts only after your go-ahead.
| Common problem | How Shodhyantri helps |
|---|---|
| Submitting only because a Special Issue invitation arrived by email. | Check the Special Issue page, guest editors and journal scope first. Invitations are common and not personal endorsements. |
| Assuming every MDPI journal is indexed in Scopus and Web of Science. | Check the current Scopus source list and Web of Science master list for that exact journal before submission. |
| Discovering the article processing charge only after acceptance. | Read the journal's charge page before submission and confirm your funding or institutional agreement in advance. |
| Asking for long extensions on a short revision deadline repeatedly. | Plan time before submission, request a reasonable extension early if needed, and keep the academic editor informed. |
| Leaving MDPI back matter sections such as author contributions incomplete. | Complete author contributions, funding, data availability and conflict of interest statements using MDPI's required headings. |
| Ignoring a reviewer comment because the deadline is short. | Answer every comment, even briefly. Explain any point you cannot address now and why. |
Each MDPI journal lists scope, indexing, editorial board and charges. Use these pages, then confirm indexing externally.
Check guest editors' publication records in your field. Their expertise affects how your Special Issue paper is handled.
The template sets structure and back matter correctly, reducing technical returns and making the review process smoother.
MDPI asks for data availability details. Decide what can be shared and where before you submit.
Short revision windows are common. Keep a few days free after expected decision dates to work properly.
Some institutions and committees have guidance on open access publishers. Confirm before using the paper for evaluation.
MDPI offers preprint posting. Check your field's norms and co-authors' views before choosing it.
Make sure the billing name and address match your institution's requirements for reimbursement or payment.
Your work is handled by people who read your field's literature, not by a single generalist.
A PhD-qualified specialist from your field who checks the research logic, gap and contribution.
Handles statistics, models and qualitative coding, and documents every analytical decision.
Improves structure, flow, clarity and academic tone without changing your meaning.
Builds and validates MATLAB, Python, ANSYS or COMSOL work where your study needs it.
Checks grammar, consistency, numbering, citations and the small errors examiners notice.
Applies your university or journal template, reference style and front matter exactly.
No. The research and writing remain yours. We support the publication process: assessing MDPI journals and Special Issues, preparing the SuSy submission with you, planning costs, analysing reviewer reports and drafting responses jointly. Our separate editing service can improve clarity without changing your results or conclusions.
No. The article processing charge is payable only after acceptance, and acceptance is decided by academic editors through peer review. Fast processing does not mean automatic acceptance. Papers are rejected at various stages. We help you prepare carefully and respond well, but outcomes are the editors' decision.
Many are, but not all, and coverage can change after database re-evaluation. The same applies to Web of Science. We check the current official source lists for your specific journal at the time of submission and note the date of that check.
They are often shorter than at many other publishers, and the exact period appears in the decision email. Extensions can sometimes be requested. We help you plan time before submission so you can revise properly within the window given.
It depends. Check whether the theme matches your work, whether the guest editors are credible in your field, and whether the journal suits your institution. An invitation does not mean acceptance. We review the invitation with you and suggest alternatives where appropriate.
We can explain the usual routes, such as institutional agreements, reviewer vouchers or MDPI's own waiver policies, and help you prepare a request. The decision rests with MDPI and your institution. We do not promise any discount or waiver.
Policies differ. Some universities follow UGC-CARE or Scopus listings, and some committees have specific views on publishers. Check with your department or research cell. We help you collect the journal's current indexing and editorial details for that discussion.
We provide research guidance, statistical analysis, editing, formatting and training support. All research content remains the scholar's own work, in line with UGC and university academic integrity norms. We do not guarantee publication, acceptance, indexing or academic outcomes: journals decide through peer review and universities award degrees.
Share your topic, draft or data. We will tell you honestly what it needs, and what it does not, before you pay anything.